From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Sebastian 'spax' Pape" Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 14:21:22 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] Traffic shaping with transparent proxy Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org hi! > If you are using Transparent cache ( Squid) > better you use delay pools, it works greate like large downloads to be > controled I'm not really up to date with delay pools, but as far as I remember they only shape the traffic of squid among all squid-users and don't know anything about the available bandwidth. So the problem to allocate bandwidth to squid (vs. other traffic like, ssh, ftp, smtp, ...) still remains or am I getting something wrong here? best regards Sebastian -- Sebastian 'spax' Pape | Better to remain silent and be thought a fool mailto: sebastian@p-a-p-e.de | than to speak and remove all doubt. gpg: http://p-a-p-e.de/gpg.asc | --- Do you want to know more? http://www.p-a-p-e.de/ --- _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/