Re: [LARTC] Traffic shaping with transparent proxy

["hare ram" <hareram@sol.net.in>]

Hi

If that is the case, iam also working on same
some recomendation given in this list is

htb and imq, iam still working, hope it make help you this hint to work

hare
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sebastian 'spax' Pape" <pape@rbg.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de>
To: "hare ram" <hareram@sol.net.in>
Cc: <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2003 7:51 PM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Traffic shaping with transparent proxy


> hi!
>
> > If you are using Transparent cache ( Squid)
> > better you use delay pools, it works greate like large downloads to be
> > controled
>
> I'm not really up to date with delay pools, but as far as I remember they
> only shape the traffic of squid among all squid-users and don't know
> anything about the available bandwidth. So the problem to allocate
> bandwidth to squid (vs. other traffic like, ssh, ftp, smtp, ...) still
> remains or am I getting something wrong here?
>
> best regards
>
> Sebastian
>
> --
> Sebastian 'spax' Pape          | Better to remain silent and be thought a
fool
> mailto: sebastian@p-a-p-e.de   | than to speak and remove all doubt.
> gpg: http://p-a-p-e.de/gpg.asc |
>          --- Do you want to know more? http://www.p-a-p-e.de/ ---
>

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/