From: "hare ram" <hareram@sol.net.in>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] IMQ problem -- badly need help
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 10:12:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-105057362312451@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-105057291911505@msgid-missing>
Do you thing its iptables problem
even i have cheked with iptables 1.2.7a
still iam not succeeded
when i make rules with out IMQ, iam able to see all the traffic
even postrouting and prerouting
really confusing this,
hare
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stef Coene" <stef.coene@docum.org>
To: "hare ram" <hareram@sol.net.in>; <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 3:17 PM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] IMQ problem -- badly need help
> On Thursday 17 April 2003 11:43, hare ram wrote:
> > Hi all Guru's
> >
> > I have been try to work on this IMQ more than 4 weeks but i could not
get
> > any results
> > really and badly need to help to achive my setup
> >
> > iam trying to achieve is up+down=total bandwidth, as per the user groups
> > suggestion
> > i would like to use IMQ to make my setup to achive this
> >
> > my setup is , RH 9.0 with patch bridge-nf
> > and patched IMQ with iptables 1.2.8 and POM also done
> > HTB also patched with latest ip route
> >
> > my bridge is running fine, iam able to use transparent bridge, working
that
> > also
> >
> > laptop---switch--eth1(bridge)eht0--switch--Router--internet
> >
> >
> > next i have executed small example
> >
> > iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -j IMQ --todev 0
> > ----
> > " when i executed above line i got this message
> > [root@bridge root]# iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -j
IMQ --todev
> > 0
> > iptables: target `IMQ' v1.2.6a (I'm v1.2.8).
> > ----
> > iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp --dport 20 -m
state --state
> > ESTABLISHED -j MARK --set-mark 1
> > iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp --dport 80 -m
state --state
> > ESTABLISHED -j MARK --set-mark 2
> > iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp --dport 25 -m
state --state
> > ESTABLISHED -j MARK --set-mark 3
>
> This is your problem. I think the iptables rule is not added. But don't
ask
> me why. Maybe you use the wrong iptables version? I don't know.
>
> Stef
>
> --
>
> stef.coene@docum.org
> "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
> http://www.docum.org/
> #lartc @ irc.oftc.net
>
>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-17 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-17 9:47 [LARTC] IMQ problem -- badly need help Stef Coene
2003-04-17 9:55 ` hare ram
2003-04-17 10:12 ` hare ram [this message]
2003-04-17 10:13 ` Stef Coene
2003-04-17 13:16 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-105057362312451@msgid-missing \
--to=hareram@sol.net.in \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.