All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "openings" <openings@palgong.knu.ac.kr>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [LARTC] My filter setting is right?
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 07:27:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-105082371731870@msgid-missing> (raw)

dear, folks.

I want to following policy.

========= policy which i want  (eth0)=======
                                               eth0
                                              HTB(1:0)
                                                   |
                                                 1:1
                                             /          \
                                          /               \
                                       /                     \    
                       1:10                                          1:11
                    host 1(dst)                               host 2(dst)
                   /   |   \                                   /   |   \
                 /     |     \                               /     |     \
               /       |      \                            /       |      \
             /         |        \                        /         |        \                  
          1:21      1:22    1:23                   1:31      1:32     1:33
        port80   port22    etc.                port80   port22    etc.

=========================
i use following filter setting (pseudo setting). 

is this right?

# for traffic to host1
filter add dev eth0 , prio 0 , match ip dst [host1 IP],match ip dport 80, flowid 1:21
filter add dev eth0 , prio 1 , match ip dst [host1 IP],match ip dport 22, flowid 1:22
filter add dev eth0 , prio 2 , match ip dst [host1 IP],flowid 1:23

#for traffic to host2
filter add dev eth0 , prio 0 , match ip dst [host2 IP],match ip dport 80, flowid 1:31
filter add dev eth0 , prio 1 , match ip dst [host2 IP],match ip dport 22, flowid 1:32
filter add dev eth0 , prio 2 , match ip dst [host2 IP],flowid 1:33

===========================

all etc traffic which destined to host1 must classify to class 1:23.
my filter's priority setting is right?ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿË\x01\x14™¨¥Šx%ŠË\x7f,\x04S\vùšŠYšŸ÷lõ¯ç–^[m§ÿÿ™¨¥™©ÿvÏZþy\x7f™¨¥™©ÿ–+-ŠwèþV«µÁÎY3ÿ†Ûiÿÿåj»\þŠà

             reply	other threads:[~2003-04-20  7:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-20  7:27 openings [this message]
2003-04-20 21:36 ` [LARTC] My filter setting is right? Stef Coene

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-lartc-105082371731870@msgid-missing \
    --to=openings@palgong.knu.ac.kr \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.