From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stef Coene Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 21:51:57 +0000 Subject: Re: RV: [LARTC] Re: My 1st BW Manager Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org On Saturday 19 April 2003 17:19, rio@martin.mu wrote: > On Saturday 19 April 2003 12:10, GoMi wrote: > Hi Stef, Are u sure havent heard DAP before ? this is as same as prozilla > under linux. My average downloads are 400kbyte/s so I don't need a download accelerator to speed up downloads :) > >And if they do, how many? And the other services that suffers from these > >DAP > >streams, is that also download (bulk traffic) or interactive traffic (ssh, > >telnet, dns)? > >And I suppose the DAP traffic and the other traffic belongs to different > >classes. > > Maximum 10 connections to the same destination server. If they open 1 DAP. > Sadly my users often download with 3 - 5 DAP. So when i sniff their > connection, the results of tcp connection arrount 30 tcp connection to > remote host port 80. So it's just parallel tcp sessions to the same hosts. But if you put the traffic from each host in 1 class, each class (and so each host) has the same right for bandwidth. > DAP is badly sucks my total bandwidth. So all other traffic would be very > slow and didnt get fair bandwidth as i located.. Stef -- stef.coene@docum.org "Using Linux as bandwidth manager" http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.oftc.net _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/