From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stef Coene Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 09:12:03 +0000 Subject: Re: RV: [LARTC] Re: My 1st BW Manager Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org On Monday 21 April 2003 04:30, Martin A. Brown wrote: > Rio, > > : I give you real situation in my network: > : > : eth0[PUBLIC.IP] > : LINUX - BW - Manager > : eth1[192.168.1.10] > : > : > : 4 hosts: 192.168.1.1 - 192.168.1.4 > : > : My total bandwidth is only 128Kbit > : All NICs are Realtek 10Mbit > : > : So the solution as you offered is to put each class 128Kbit/4 = 32Kbit? > : If that so, then it would be good if i use CBQ qdisc, not HTB. I want to > : use HTB because HTB burstable. > > I would suggest the following configuration (as Stef has proposed): > > 128kbit ceil 128kbit +---- rate 32kbit ceil 128kbit <-- 192.168.1.1 > > +---------------+---- rate 32kbit ceil 128kbit <-- 192.168.1.2 > > +---- rate 32kbit ceil 128kbit <-- 192.168.1.3 > > +---- rate 32kbit ceil 128kbit <-- 192.168.1.4 > > Now, you have four different classes, one for each IP. Each IP is > guaranteed 128kbit. Each IP Is guaranteed 32 kbit, not 128 kbit. > Each IP can consume up to 128kbit, if there isn't > competition with other classes. > > You should use the qdisc with which you are most comfortable--both CBQ and > HTB can do this for you. For reference, it seems that the experience on > this list leans toward HTB, though. Stef -- stef.coene@docum.org "Using Linux as bandwidth manager" http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.oftc.net _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/