Re: [LARTC] Monitoring problem,

["hare ram" <hareram@sol.net.in>]

Hi

thanks, for the quick reply

I have made configuration like
each block like x.x.x.0/24 should get 128kbps
another Block y.y.y.0/24 should get 256kbps

when when i mark them and divert to IMQ Device

iam not able to achive this, iam able to control only uploads

but downloads iam able to see maximum ceil of b/w

would mind give me small example where i can control both sides


and another question is, i have created the rules more than 2 class
But iam not able to see more than 2 class, when i do monitor_tc.pl


thanks
hare
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stef Coene" <stef.coene@docum.org>
To: "hare ram" <hareram@sol.net.in>
Cc: <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 1:36 AM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Monitoring problem,


> > > > i have downloaded monitor_tc.pl, and try to monitor my imq0 Device
> > > That's from docum.org.
> > Yes I have downloaded from Docum.org and i have changed from eth0 to
imq0
> I said that for the other members of the list so they know what
monitor_tc.pl
> is.
>
> > > > modprobe imq numdevs=1
> > > >  tc qdisc add dev imq0 handle 1: root htb default 1
> > > >  tc class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1mbit
> > > >  tc qdisc add dev imq0 parent 1:1 handle 10: htb default 5
> > > Adding a htb qdisc to a class is useless and will only add extra
delays.
> > Ok i understand now, let me correct it, since let it be delay the
> > proceedure should work right ?
> Yes.  It works with that extra qdisc.
>
> > > If you upload, the packets are entering the box with destination
address
> > the
> > > ip-address of your box.  I'm not sure when the packet gets demasqued
but
> > when
> > > this happens AFTER the marking, your packets have not the dst address
of
> > your
> > > host so they are not marked and they end up in the default class.
> > See while iam uploading to test FTP Server,
> > i have table which all the packets which is belong to ftp  or any to go
to
> > IMQ Device
> > and while iam downloading also the same
> > Please correct if iam wrong
> Sorry, bot our english is not so good.  I have no idea about what you want
to
> say.
>
> > i have lot of  individual clients, who required up+down=total b/w
> > so for each customer i need to have different IMQ Device or
> > all can be used with one IMQ Device , and make some classes  for each IP
to
> > solve the problem
> You can create 1 imq device and give each client a class.  So each client
has
> his traffic in his own class.
>
> Stef
>
> --
>
> stef.coene@docum.org
>  "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
>      http://www.docum.org/
>      #lartc @ irc.oftc.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/