From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nickola Kolev Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 14:47:39 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] esfq experience anyone? MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=.vHG1G3YaLJ14gU" Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: To: lartc@vger.kernel.org --=.vHG1G3YaLJ14gU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 26 Apr 2003 15:07:52 +0200 Matthias Weingart wrote: : On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 12:29:12PM +0300, Nickola Kolev wrote: : : > Did anyone tried it, and more important, did it worked the way it is supposed to? : > As of my experience, I saw several connections matched right against the filters : > and put into the correct class, but the bandwidth management wasn't even remotely : > fair. : : Did you use a kernel with : #define PSCHED_CLOCK_SOURCE PSCHED_CPU in linux/include/net/sched/pkt_sched.h : or just the standard kernel? : : Matthias Nope, The place for pkt_sched.h here is linux/include/net/pkt_sched.h. And there #define PSCHED_CLOCK_SOURCE PSCHED_JIFFIES Can you tell me what's the difference? I mean, I see that in your case clock source for packet scheduling is #defined as PSCHED_CPU, and in mine as PSCHED_JIFFIES, but what's the impact on esfq? TIA, Nickola --=.vHG1G3YaLJ14gU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+qpwOKagUb5QT4IYRAgOBAKC8qEvW/UFrgwmT/SrCzMi6WcNmOwCfd7Qx GUUz8JJmq9O8nf4+KJ7sZB8= =oHpk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=.vHG1G3YaLJ14gU-- _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/