From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "openings" <openings@palgong.knu.ac.kr>
Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 07:17:31 +0000
Subject: [LARTC] quantum vs. r2q ?
Message-Id: <marc-lartc-105177382822634@msgid-missing>
List-Id: <lartc.vger.kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org

Thanks for your answer. stef.

My exmaple is not suitable.=20

but, On 100Mbit Ethernet Network environment.

Some class's rate can be 1Mbps.

The other class's rate can be 30Mbps

In this situation, when r2q=10, automatic set quantum value =3D 12500 (1Mbp=
s class) =20
                                               automatic set quantum value =
=3D 375000(30Mbps class) =3D> too big!

                        when r2q=100, automatic set quantum value =3D 1250 =
(1Mbps class)=3D> too small!
                                                automatic set quantum value=
 =3D 37500 (30Mbps class)=20

                        when r2q P, automatic set quantum value =3D 2500 (1=
Mbps class)
                                                automatic set quantum value=
 =3D 75000 (30Mbps class)=3D> too big!

Searching of r2q value is too difficult.=20

In above situation,=20
I select r2q =3D 50, and when I create 30Mbps class, I use quantum0000 opti=
on.
Is this right?
=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=
=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=FF=CB=01=14=C2=99=A8=A5=8Ax%=8A=CB=7F,=04S=0B=
=F9=9A=8AY=9A=9F=F7l=F5=AF=E7=96=1Bm=A7=FF=FF=99=A8=A5=99=A9=FFv=CFZ=FEy=7F=
=99=A8=A5=99=A9=FF=96+-=8Aw=E8=FEV=AB=B5=C1=CEY3=FF=86=DBi=FF=FF=E5j=BB\=FE=
=8A=E0