From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stef Coene Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 09:20:33 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] quantum vs. r2q ? Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 01 May 2003 09:17, openings wrote: > Thanks for your answer. stef. > > My exmaple is not suitable. > > but, On 100Mbit Ethernet Network environment. > > Some class's rate can be 1Mbps. > > The other class's rate can be 30Mbps > > In this situation, when r2q, automatic set quantum value = 12500 (1Mbps > class) automatic set quantum value = 375000(30Mbps class) => too big! > > when r2q0, automatic set quantum value = 1250 > (1Mbps class)=> too small! automatic set quantum value = 37500 (30Mbps > class) > > when r2q P, automatic set quantum value = 2500 > (1Mbps class) automatic set quantum value = 75000 (30Mbps class)=> too > big! > > Searching of r2q value is too difficult. > > In above situation, > I select r2q = 50, and when I create 30Mbps class, I use quantum0000 > option. Is this right? Yes. But don't worry about a wrong quantum. It's only used when 2 classes are asking for more bandwidth then the rate. Stef -- stef.coene@docum.org "Using Linux as bandwidth manager" http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.oftc.net _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/