From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stef Coene Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 19:20:25 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] problem with tc filter Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org On Monday 05 May 2003 21:15, miller69@gmx.net wrote: > > On Monday 05 May 2003 20:10, miller69@gmx.net wrote: > > > That works very well but at some point of my project i need to switch > > > > over > > > > > just using one mark (or more exact using just one firewall-rule) for > > > > both > > > > > filters. So i tried to change the second filter: > > > > > > tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 4 handle 12 fw > > > > classid > > > > > 1:12 > > > tc filter add dev eth1 parent 2:0 protocol ip prio 4 handle 12 fw > > > > classid > > > > > 2:22 > > > > > > That did not work, just the first filter was used but the other never > > > catched a paket. My question: is there a way to handle this by a mask > > > > for > > > > > the handle for example? Any hints are very much appreciated! > > > > Why not doing > > tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 4 handle 12 fw classid > > 2:22 > > I've tried it and the answer was: > RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument > > So that did not work. Any other ideas? I really need this going! Something else. Qdisc 2:0 is attached to 1:12 I suppose. But why? This is not needed if 1: and 2: are htb qdiscs. Stef -- stef.coene@docum.org "Using Linux as bandwidth manager" http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.oftc.net _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/