From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin A. Brown" Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 14:43:44 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] dsmark, unkown Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org Well, : thanx for the help, it was bec. of the tc, i downloaded the source and : "make"ed it. But the old one I had supports the HTB, whereas the new : binary doesn't support it (but dsmark already), is it a problem when I : use both (one called tc & the other tc_new)? I don't really know whether that's advisable or not. I do not know of any problem this can cause, but why not try applying the htb patch [1]? It's not so hard, and then you have a single binary to call instead of two different binaries. Maybe somebody else can answer your question about potential problems of using multiple tc binaries. Frankly, I think it's probably mostly confusing for the human. -Martin [1] http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/v3/htb3.6-020525.tgz -- Martin A. Brown --- SecurePipe, Inc. --- mabrown@securepipe.com _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/