All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stef Coene <stef.coene@docum.org>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Unclarified issue
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 19:18:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-105276907923157@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-105274679628578@msgid-missing>

On Monday 12 May 2003 15:35, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> Hi all,
> Just finished reading and re-reading the advanced routing how-to. This this
> is marvelous!!! Thank you all that spent your time and devoted it to such a
> great paper! However there is something that I am missing from the picture.
> By default each interface is bundled with the pfifo_fast that prioritizes
> the packets based on TOS. If for say we do this: # tc qdisc add dev eth0
> root tbf rate 100kbit latency 100ms urst 2048 Do we actually lose the whole
> point of TOS? Or there is stil an underlying filter somewhere in the kernel
> that will take care of the TOS scheduling just like pfifo_fast did?
You loose the TOS settings.

> Also in the following example:
> # tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: prio
> We automatically create three handles 1:1 1:2 1:3, with the default
> priomap. However what happens to traffic that goes down 1:1 if there is no
> qdisc attached to it? Does it get dequeued right off the back or there is
> again something similar to pfifo_fast waiting for it?
There is always a qdisc responsible for sending the packets.  If you add a 
prio qdisc, you also created 3 small fifo qdiscs for each class.

If you want some example shaping scripts (mostly cbq and htb), you can go to 
docum.org.

Stef

-- 

stef.coene@docum.org
 "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
     http://www.docum.org/
     #lartc @ irc.oftc.net


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2003-05-12 19:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-12 13:35 [LARTC] Unclarified issue Peter Rabbitson
2003-05-12 19:18 ` Stef Coene [this message]
2003-05-12 21:08 ` Peter Rabbitson
2003-05-13 17:13 ` Stef Coene

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-lartc-105276907923157@msgid-missing \
    --to=stef.coene@docum.org \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.