From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nickola Kolev <nikky@mnet.bg>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 19:38:03 +0000
Subject: Re: [LARTC] NIC recommendations
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=.CM,ZcaV03'vDNy"
Message-Id: <marc-lartc-105345958818869@msgid-missing>
List-Id: <lartc.vger.kernel.org>
References: <marc-lartc-105345672815485@msgid-missing>
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-105345672815485@msgid-missing>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org

--=.CM,ZcaV03'vDNy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Tue, 20 May 2003 14:50:55 -0400
"Harkisoon Sharan (CCI-Gainesville)" <Sharan.Harkisoon@cox.com> wrote:

 : Can anyone recommend off-the-shelf NICS that perform pretty well with high amounts  : (10-20mbits) of traffic?

Ehm... ;)))

With such a "high" ammount you can take almost any off-the-shelf NIC, eg. even
Realtek 8139 based cards. But I'd recommend 3Com - EtherLink XL 3c900 or 3c905,
3c540/3c900/3c905/3c980/3c575/3c656, 3c905, or Intel EtherExpressPro/100, if
you can afford'em, of course. They are pretty stable and I'm quite happy with 
their performance.

-- 
_____________________________________________________________

Best regards,
Nickola

--=.CM,ZcaV03'vDNy
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+yoQdKagUb5QT4IYRAqYOAKDHTVjKWfUBOyMCnL3czmQWtJtT2ACgjyIa
KL8b5Uv9zSqLESHCLhRX/vc=
=0ci6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=.CM,ZcaV03'vDNy--
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/