From: Riaan Annandale <riaana@mundane.co.za>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Routing tables and netfilter
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 11:58:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-105403684530269@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-105402467118660@msgid-missing>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1895 bytes --]
Howzit Guys,
I got the problem sorted,
I used the examples under "Routing for multiple uplinks/providers" to
route stuff out the same interface that it comes and in, and voila!,
bob's yer uncle!
I wonder if that might not be why the stuff mentioned below didn't work
in the first place.
Well anyway, cheers!
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 10:36:31AM +0200, Riaan Annandale wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> A couple of days ago I sent a mail here regarding routing browsing
> packets to a different gateway. Well here's an update which I believe
> will shed more light on the problem.
>
> I am now marking all TCP and udp packets on a test box with a one.
>
> I then route these packets via a routing table through an ISDN device.
>
> If I delete this route I instantly get destination net unreachable from
> the client side (my linux box)
>
> When I add it back in, it just sits and eventually times out.
>
> If I do a tcpdump on the server that I am trying to telnet I can see
> that it's getting the packets that I send to establish the connection
> and is sending the SYN packets back, but yet my side still just sits. It
> almost appears that it doesn't work with MASQ.
>
> Now before everyone starts nailing me about MASQ as per
> "IMPORTANT: We received a report that MASQ and SNAT at least collide
> with marking packets." and "Turn off the reverse path filter to make it
> work properly." - I have done that and I get the same results.
>
> It appears that the packets are being dropped somewhere.
>
> It feels like I am missing something really small and arb.
>
> Any help would be appreciated
---end quoted text---
--
Regards,
Riaan Annandale
Linux Systems Engineer (LPIC-1, CCNA)
0861 22 55 86
riaana at mundane dot co dot za
---------------------
Angels we have heard on High
Tell us to go out and Buy.
-- Tom Lehrer
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-27 11:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-27 8:36 [LARTC] Routing tables and netfilter Riaan Annandale
2003-05-27 9:02 ` Riaan Annandale
2003-05-27 9:04 ` Paul Evans
2003-05-27 9:12 ` Daniel Ortiz
2003-05-27 9:25 ` Riaan Annandale
2003-05-27 11:58 ` Riaan Annandale [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-105403684530269@msgid-missing \
--to=riaana@mundane.co.za \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.