From: "Ryan Agler" <ryanagler@hotmail.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [LARTC] Artificial latency
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2003 20:09:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-105518947702585@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-105502807826973@msgid-missing>
Hi Charles,
Thanks for your response! I followed your advice and installed the nistnet
kernel module, and after a lot of wrestling it worked.
Ill explain why I need a delay to incoming UDP traffic -- 192.168.1.4 is a
Cisco ATA-186 Analog Telephone Adaptor, which lets me hook up a normal
phone/fax machine and place calls over the Internet. It turns out that
there is a slight asymmetric delay, i.e. the time between when I speak into
the phone and its heard by the person I call is longer than the time between
her speaking and me hearing it. This is fine for voice, but intolerable to
my fax machine. So, I used the nistnet module to delay incoming UDP packets
to 192.168.1.4 by 300 milliseconds, and got the 'symmetric' delay I was
seeking and faxes are working!
I am wondering if anyone out there can think of another delaying solution
using a qdisc?? I had many problems getting the nistnet module installed;
it refused to coexist with an lt_serial module that allows my faxmodem to
work, and causes sporadic fits with my kernel.
Any advice is appreciated!
Thanks,
+Ryan
-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Shick [mailto:chuck.shick@manchotnetworks.net]
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 4:12 AM
To: Ryan Agler
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Artificial latency
hi ryan,
i had asked a similar question a while back, and stef recommended the
following:
http://snad.ncsl.nist.gov/itg/nistnet
make sure to read the faq!
cheers
charles
On Sun, 2003-06-08 at 01:19, Ryan Agler wrote:
> I have a situation where I would like to introduce an artificial delay of
> 100 milliseconds to incoming UDP traffic to a particular client. Here is
my
> setup:
>
> +-------+ +-----------+
> | Linux | | |
> 'Internet'---eth1| NAT |eth0===|192.168.1.4|
> | | | |
> +-------+ +-----------+
>
> Note I'm not looking to restrict the RATE or SPEED at all, just to add a
> DELAY, and only to incoming UDP packets coming in from the Internet
destined
> for 192.168.1.4. I have kernel 2.4.20 with all the latest and greatest
tc,
> htb patches, etc.
>
> Can anyone help??
>
> Thanks much,
> +Ryan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-09 20:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-07 23:19 [LARTC] Artificial latency Ryan Agler
2003-06-08 9:06 ` lartc
2003-06-09 20:09 ` Ryan Agler [this message]
2003-06-10 6:52 ` lartc
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-105518947702585@msgid-missing \
--to=ryanagler@hotmail.com \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.