All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thilo Schulz <arny@ats.s.bawue.de>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] CBQ-wondershaper superior over HTB-wondershaper?
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:50:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-105577859305958@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-105577796205170@msgid-missing>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 16 June 2003 17:18, Griem, Hans T wrote:
> Hello Thilo,
>
> What did you find superior with CBQ-wondershaper over HTB-wondershaper? We
> have not been using wondershaper specifically but our simple tests so far
> seem to show that htb is much easier to configure for a given target shape
> (i.,e accurate) compared to CBQ.

I did not set up the cbq wondershaper, my father actually set the 
cbq-wondershaper respectively the htb-wondershaper up, and the ping latencies 
while large uploads were considerably better when using the cbq version.
I haven't run any large-scaled tests, but this is the experience I had in 
practice.

 - Thilo Schulz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+7ec7Zx4hBtWQhl4RAohkAJ4sKA6j0u8g5RdOh/IDtLeDWAoC+gCfdlIw
lvirBt6tswiWrggv/vzxZHA=SPWK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

      reply	other threads:[~2003-06-16 15:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-06-16 15:18 [LARTC] CBQ-wondershaper superior over HTB-wondershaper? Griem, Hans T
2003-06-16 15:50 ` Thilo Schulz [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-lartc-105577859305958@msgid-missing \
    --to=arny@ats.s.bawue.de \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.