From: Derek Sims <derek@interdart.co.uk>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [LARTC] iptables add - heavy on cpu time
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 16:40:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-105595452917276@msgid-missing> (raw)
I have a firewall (No NAT - just routing) configuration with a large
number of chains and rules.
I am now testing it on RH9 and it seems to take 100% user CPU time for
more than 30 minutes for the script to run (I am still waiting for it to
finish)
On RH7.1 a similar set of rules takes about 30 seconds to load (also at
around 100% cpu)
Is this a known "feature" or am I missing something?
TIA
Derek
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
reply other threads:[~2003-06-18 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-105595452917276@msgid-missing \
--to=derek@interdart.co.uk \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.