All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: K S Sreeram <sreeram@tachyontech.net>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [LARTC] bandwidth limiting incoming data
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 03:53:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-105642682611281@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-105637139023569@msgid-missing>

On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 22:05, S Mohan wrote:
> Let us say eth0 is connected the Internet and eth1 to the local LAN. Then
> shaping outgoing traffic on eth1 is equivalent to throttling incoming on
> eth0. Another alternative is to use the IMQ device. I recommend the first
> method.

The problem is that I dont have a separate router. I have a single
machine (a laptop), which is connected to the internet with a 128kbps
connection.

I dont know how to do incoming traffic shaping, when only one machine is
present, which is typical in home usage scenarios.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: lartc-admin@mailman.ds9a.nl [mailto:lartc-admin@mailman.ds9a.nl]On
> Behalf Of K S Sreeram
> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 6:01 PM
> To: lartc
> Subject: Re: [LARTC] bandwidth limiting incoming data
> 
> 
> On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 05:47, Trevor Warren wrote:
> > Hello Sreram,
> >
> >  AFAIK all Traffic Shaping be it Ingress/Egress can be done at your end.
> > This will help majorly on the link at your end by prioritising trafic
> > appropriately.
> >
> >  You can't possibly change traffic priorities at your isps end.
> >
> 
> Maybe my mail wasnt clear, but what i wanted to know is how to shape
> incoming traffic on my box, and not at the ISP's end, which I cant
> control.
> 
> >
> > On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 17:38, K S Sreeram wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I am connected to the internet thru a 128kbps connection, with a single
> > > box. There is no separate router.
> > >
> > > I have a 'cvs update' going on for a rather large repository.
> > > Whenever there is any HTTP traffic(browser/wget/apt-get etc), the CVS
> > > traffic seems to come to a halt. So it looks like my ISP is giving
> > > higher priority to HTTP traffic.
> > >
> > > Is there any way I can give higher priority to the CVS traffic?
> > >
> > > I have read lartc, but all the techniques it talks about
> > > (cbq, htb etc) works only for outgoing traffic, not for incoming data.
> > > I am not sure if the ingress qdisc is suitable for this problem
> > >
> > > In freebsd, I could use 'ipfw pipes' to control incoming traffic too..
> > > Is there a similar mechanism that can be done in linux?
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > Thanks in Advance!
> > --
> > ( >-    GNU/LINUX, It's all about CHOICE      -< )
> > /~\    __  trevor@clovertechnologies.com  __   /~\
> > |  \) /  Pre Sales Consultant - Red Hat     \ (/ |
> > |_|_  \    9820349221(M) | 22881326(O)      / _|_|
> >        \___________________________________/
> >
> --
> K S Sreeram
> Director of Research
> Tachyon Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
> 
-- 
K S Sreeram
Director of Research
Tachyon Technologies Pvt. Ltd.


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-06-24  3:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-06-23  0:29 [LARTC] bandwidth limiting incoming data Trevor Warren
2003-06-23 12:20 ` K S Sreeram
2003-06-23 12:43 ` K S Sreeram
2003-06-24  3:53 ` K S Sreeram [this message]
2003-06-26 19:59 ` Stef Coene
2003-06-26 21:49 ` Bernard Robbins
2003-06-27  5:42 ` K S Sreeram
2003-06-30 18:25 ` Steve Wright
2003-07-01 19:39 ` Stef Coene

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-lartc-105642682611281@msgid-missing \
    --to=sreeram@tachyontech.net \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.