From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Kai Weber <lists@glorybox.de>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 12:49:59 +0000
Subject: Re: [LARTC] traffic controlling strategy
Message-Id: <marc-lartc-105645912903654@msgid-missing>
List-Id: <lartc.vger.kernel.org>
References: <marc-lartc-105644555723803@msgid-missing>
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-105644555723803@msgid-missing>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org

* alexandru matei <alex@qb.ro>:

> 1/ using default outbound shaping  on eth1 (outside interface) for
> outgoing and outbound shaping on eth0 (inside interface) for incoming
> 2/  using default outbound shaping  on eth1 (outside interface) for
> outgoing and inbound shaping (with IMQ) on eth1 (outside interface) for
> incoming
> ...
> Which combination do you recommand? Any reason for your recommandation?

I have the same problem and thinking of an third strategy:

3/ Splitting the outside interface into two virtual interfaces: eth0:0
for incoming, eth0:1 for outgoing traffic and routing the two interfaces
that both traffic seems to go out of the interface.

Bad english maybe, but probably totally wrong, too.

Kai
-- 
* mail kai.weber@glorybox.de
  web http://www.glorybox.de
  pgp 0x594D4132
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/