From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "William L. Thomson Jr." Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 23:08:12 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] two upstreams without nat Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 13:44, Aaron Dewell wrote: > Of course, that > requires having globally routable address space in the first place, but I > assume that you do. Most of the time this is the exact reason why BGP is not used. I have considered purchasing a block. However I doubt many ISP's would want to route those IP's to DSL lines or equivalent. Maybe a T-1. So if you have DSL lines or equivalent and a small block of static or dynamic IP addresses then BGP is not an option. -- Sincerely, William L. Thomson Jr. Support Group Obsidian-Studios, Inc. 3548 Jamestown Ln. Jacksonville, FL 32223 Phone/Fax 904.260.2445 http://www.obsidian-studios.com _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/