From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rajesh Srivastava" Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 09:05:44 +0000 Subject: [LARTC] Difference between tc reported rate and IPTraf Rate MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0027_01C349AC.6F58D0C0" Message-Id: List-Id: To: lartc@vger.kernel.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C349AC.6F58D0C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am using HTB+IMQ on an Ethernet bridge and tc for statistics = reporting. I am finding that tc reported rate is about 5-10% less than that = reported by IPTraf for the same traffic. Has anyone observed this before? Which is more accurate? Rajesh ------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C349AC.6F58D0C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I am using HTB+IMQ on an Ethernet = bridge and=20 tc for statistics reporting.

I am finding that=20 tc reported rate is about 5-10% less than that = reported by=20 IPTraf for the same traffic.

Has anyone observed this before? Which = is more=20 accurate?

Rajesh

------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C349AC.6F58D0C0-- _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/