From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Trevor Warren Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 09:22:32 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] Difference between tc reported rate and IPTraf Rate Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org Hey pal, What about the overhead part to create the display that flows between the internet gateway(Machine you are monitoring) and your machine???. Trevor On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 14:35, Rajesh Srivastava wrote: > I am using HTB+IMQ on an Ethernet bridge and tc for statistics > reporting. > > I am finding that tc reported rate is about 5-10% less than that > reported by IPTraf for the same traffic. > > Has anyone observed this before? Which is more accurate? > > Rajesh -- ( >- LINUX, It's all about CHOICE -< ) /~\ __ twarren@redhat.com __ /~\ | \) / Pre Sales Consultant - Red Hat \ (/ | |_|_ \ 9820349221(M) | 22881326(O) / _|_| \___________________________________/ _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/