[LARTC] Difference between tc reported rate and IPTraf Rate

["Rajesh Srivastava" <rajesh@balcomt.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1434 bytes --]

[LARTC] Difference between tc reported rate and IPTraf RateTrevor,

Thanks for pointing out one of the possible reasons for the difference.

However, in this case I have also tried using the local display and got similar results ( though the difference reduces a bit).

Thanks,

Rajesh


>Hey pal,

 >What about the overhead part to create the display that flows between
>the internet gateway(Machine you are monitoring) and your machine???.

>Trevor

On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 14:35, Rajesh Srivastava wrote:
> I am using HTB+IMQ on an Ethernet bridge and tc for statistics
> reporting.
>  
> I am finding that tc reported rate is about 5-10% less than that
> reported by IPTraf for the same traffic.
>  
> Has anyone observed this before? Which is more accurate?
>  
> Rajesh 
-- 
( >-        LINUX, It's all about CHOICE      -< )
/~\    __        twarren@redhat.com       __   /~\
|  \) /  Pre Sales Consultant - Red Hat     \ (/ |
|_|_  \    9820349221(M) | 22881326(O)      / _|_|
       \___________________________________/




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    a.. Previous message: [LARTC] Difference between tc reported rate and IPTraf Rate 
    b.. Next message: [Re: [LARTC] marking in OUTPUT --mangle; locally generated packets and route lookup - broken?] 
    c.. Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] 

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3366 bytes --]