From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stef Coene Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2003 15:39:05 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] HTB for multiple users, good or bad approach? Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: lartc@vger.kernel.org On Friday 01 August 2003 16:41, Andreas Klauer wrote: > Hi, > > I have to share my internet connection (DSL) with > several other users and want to set up some kind of > traffic shaping, using HTB. > > Some users do a lot of filesharing (which take almost > all available bandwith, leaving nothing for other users), > others do online gaming and therefore need guaranteed > fast interactive connections, normal traffic then is > somewhere in the middle and should be divided between > users. > > The script I've come up with so far can be found there: > http://www.metamorpher.de/files/ipshape.sh Some remarks. You define a burst on your 1:1 class. You don't need this. = =20 And make sure that the sum of the rate of child classes =3D rate of parent = class. Also, limit all bandwidth too less then your link bandwidth so YOU = are the botleneck Using different prio's for you htb classes can be tricky. Remove the prio = parameters untill you understand what the different prio's does. > Do you think that approach could work? > I don't quite know myself, because I can hardly find > any way to test it properly. Yes. > My script currently definitely does something, > as bandwith is limited. However, I still get > lots of (apparently) error messages I can't get rid of: > > HTB: quantum of class 20101 is small. Consider r2q change.<4>HTB: quantum > of class 20103 is small. Consider r2q change.<4>HTB: quantum of class 201= 04 > is small. Consider r2q change.<4>HTB: quantum of class 20030 is small. > Consider r2q change.<4>HTB: quantum of class 20002 is big. Consider r2q > change.<7>htb*g j=90219489 HTB: quantum of class 10101 is small. Consider > r2q change.<4>HTB: quantum of class 10104 is small. Consider r2q > change.<4>HTB: quantum of class 10030 is small. Consider r2q change.<6>HTB > init, kernel part version 3.7 > > Are those critical? I tried a wide variety of values for r2q, > but it didn't help. > > Any help, opinions and other comments highly appreciated. For the quantum problem, see the faq pages on www.docum.org Stef --=20 stef.coene@docum.org "Using Linux as bandwidth manager" http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.oftc.net _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/