From: Raghuveer <raghuveer-rc@naturesoft.net>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Ingress mode
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 06:39:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-106084241418761@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-106078054523424@msgid-missing>
Thanks Martin for valuable links, Iam going through it.
I want to apply traffic control rules for the incomming traffic to my
firewall, which is what we call it as Ingress mode, am I right....?
Just to confirm, suppose my firewall WAN interface is eth0 with IP
66.218.71.198 and LAN interface is eth1 with IP 192.168.1.2. So any
traffic from Internet---->WAN is where I want to do traffic control for
my LAN IP's. Hence amI right in saying that in ingress mode traffic
control will be happening at eth0 interface(or ppp0 interface, WAN with
ppp0 enabled).
I saw in the link documents that, for ingress we are using imq0, so how
this will fit into my scenario...?. I understood that in ingress mode we
have to drop the packets instead of queueing it like in egress mode, so
is it going to have any effects other than latency...?
-Raghu
Martin A. Brown wrote:
>Raghuveer,
>
> : I would like to know whether can we do bandwidth management(traffic
> : control) for incomming traffic to firewall. For ex;- If my firewall WAN
> : interface IP is 203.145.1.2 and any data from internet comming to
> : 203.145.1.2 whether can be controlled...? If my total bandwidth= 512kb
> : and I want to allocate 100kb to a LAN m/c with IP 192.168.1.2 for http
> : traffic, how will I do it..?
>
>If your linux host is not the source or sink for any of the traffic, you
>can shape the inbound traffic on the inside interface of your bandwidth
>management box. If, however, the directly connected box is the source or
>sink for traffic, you'll need to look at other options.
>
>I would suggest considering IMQ. (Search the archives.)
>
> http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Amailman.ds9a.nl+IMQ
> http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Amailman.ds9a.nl+IMQ+ingress
>
>You can also use an ingress qdisc and a policer. (Search the archives.)
>
> http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Amailman.ds9a.nl+ingress+policer
>
>And there's a recent posting on this topic:
>
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2003q3/009572.html
>
>-Martin
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-14 6:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-13 13:28 [LARTC] Ingress mode Raghuveer
2003-08-13 13:32 ` Martin A. Brown
2003-08-14 6:39 ` Raghuveer [this message]
2003-08-15 4:24 ` Martin A. Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-106084241418761@msgid-missing \
--to=raghuveer-rc@naturesoft.net \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.