From: Catalin BOIE <util@deuroconsult.ro>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: R: [LARTC] time window in CBQ
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 10:03:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-106275628628069@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-106275575427571@msgid-missing>
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Andreani Luca wrote:
> is 64kbit/sec enough for VoIP ? I would have thought not.. but I do not
> have VoIP...
Steve, what voip codec do you use?
If you can select, use G723 (6.3 kbit/s)
>
>
> /steve
>
>
---
Catalin(ux) BOIE
catab@deuroconsult.ro
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-05 10:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-05 9:55 R: [LARTC] time window in CBQ Andreani Luca
2003-09-05 9:57 ` Steve Wright
2003-09-05 10:03 ` Catalin BOIE [this message]
2003-09-05 10:20 ` Kilian Krause
2003-09-05 10:31 ` Steve Wright
2003-09-05 13:43 ` John McCain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-106275628628069@msgid-missing \
--to=util@deuroconsult.ro \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.