From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sz=E1lka?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?_Tam=E1s?= <rontombontom@freestart.hu>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 15:22:06 +0000
Subject: Re: [LARTC] beginner question about imq
Message-Id: <marc-lartc-106338004229501@msgid-missing>
List-Id: <lartc.vger.kernel.org>
References: <marc-lartc-106318926529070@msgid-missing>
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-106318926529070@msgid-missing>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org

At 19:15 2003. 09. 11.istory. +0200, you wrote:

> >
> > The picture you have in http://www.docum.org/stef.coene/qos/kptd is with
> > (or without) the IMQ NAT patch?
>Without.  In prerouting, you see that IMQ is before nat.
>
>Stef
With the IMQ NAT patch the order is reversed? The filtering on 
de-masqueraded addresses is only possible, if NAT is b e f o r e IMQ, isn't it?
Tom



_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/