From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stef Coene Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 16:58:30 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] beginner question about imq Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: lartc@vger.kernel.org On Friday 12 September 2003 17:22, Sz=E1lka Tam=E1s wrote: > At 19:15 2003. 09. 11.istory. +0200, you wrote: > > > The picture you have in http://www.docum.org/stef.coene/qos/kptd is > > > with (or without) the IMQ NAT patch? > > > >Without. In prerouting, you see that IMQ is before nat. > > > >Stef > > With the IMQ NAT patch the order is reversed? The filtering on > de-masqueraded addresses is only possible, if NAT is b e f o r e IMQ, isn= 't > it? Tom The nat in prerouting is also reponsible for rewriting the addresses of nat= ted=20 packets. So you want IMQ after nat so the packets entering the imq device = have the real ip address. Stef --=20 stef.coene@docum.org "Using Linux as bandwidth manager" http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.oftc.net _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/