Re: [LARTC] More layer7 filtering issues

[Derek <derek@traffic-power.com>]

Heh, I'm attempting to get it to work... I'm just not sure how I can/if I can 
combine two filters together, or at least attach them to the same class... I 
guess the ideal solution would be a sub filter of a filter, or maybe 
attaching a filter to another filter, but thats probably a little 
blasphemist. I really want to be able to do this without hacking the kernel 
source. Its probably much easier to get an lartc patch committed than a 
kernel one. 

Right now, I'm using 2.5.75 w/ the layer7 patch to try it out, but as soon as 
I finish my backports of the new layer7 patches to 2.4, I'll give 2.4 a shot. 
(2.6 is awesome, but I kept getting panics when using tc to shape with a 
pre-empt enabled kernel). 

If you come up with anything, let me know, otherwise I'll post to the list 
when/if I get it working :)

Thanks,
Derek

On Friday 26 September 2003 10:11 am, you wrote:
> > > > 	So, by the looks of things, that is going to drop all of the
> > > > packets, not just class 1:10? or am I mistaken?
> > >
> > > It actually drops all incoming icmp packets. it's just an
> > > example of how to use policer to drop all packets.
> >
> > Ah, duh, I probably should stop looking at things prior to my morning
> > startbucks intake. Much obliged, though, thats exactly what I was looking
> > for.
>
> Have you managed to use the layer7 filter to block things, then?  I still
> haven't, even given that example code. (It's rather frustrating that the
> kernel hacking part of this is _easier_ than actually controlling it with
> tc...)  If you have, I'd like to see how you did it.
>
> -matthew
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/