From: Catalin BOIE <util@deuroconsult.ro>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] filter
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 05:08:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-106567619621486@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-106565321305922@msgid-missing>
Don't worry. It's tc fault (or maybe kernel).
The filters are once in the kernel but are showed no_of_prios_used times.
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Victor wrote:
> The difrence betwen these 2 configurations is only the prio parameter from
> the second filter, from each configutation.
> (tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: prio 5 protocol ip u32 ht 800:: match ip
> src 80.97.24.0/24 hashkey mask 0x000000ff at 12 link 2:)
>
> Configuration 1
>
> tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb
> tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 500Kbit prio 1
> quantum 2000
> tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:201 htb rate 4Kbit ceil 500Kbit
> prio 0 quantum 2000
> tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: prio 1 handle 2: protocol ip u32 divisor 256
> tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: prio 5 protocol ip u32 ht 800:: match ip
> src 80.97.24.0/24 hashkey mask 0x000000ff at 12 link 2:
> tc filter add dev eth0 prio 1 protocol ip u32 ht 2:01 match ip src
> 80.97.24.1 flowid 1:201
>
> Configuration 2
>
> tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb
> tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 500Kbit prio 1
> quantum 2000
> tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:201 htb rate 4Kbit ceil 500Kbit
> prio 0 quantum 2000
> tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: prio 1 handle 2: protocol ip u32 divisor 256
> tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: prio 1 protocol ip u32 ht 800:: match ip
> src 80.97.24.0/24 hashkey mask 0x000000ff at 12 link 2:
> tc filter add dev eth0 prio 1 protocol ip u32 ht 2:01 match ip src
> 80.97.24.1 flowid 1:201
>
> Configuration 1
> tc filter show dev eth1
> shows the next lines:
> filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 1 u32
> filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 801: ht divisor 1
> filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 2: ht divisor 256
> filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 2:1:800 order 2048 key ht 2 bkt
> 1 flowid 1:201
> match 50611801/ffffffff at 12
> filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 800: ht divisor 1
> filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 800::800 order 2048 key ht 800
> bkt 0 link 2:
> match 50611800/ffffff00 at 12
> hash mask 000000ff at 12
> filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 5 u32
> filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 5 u32 fh 801: ht divisor 1
> filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 5 u32 fh 2: ht divisor 256
> filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 5 u32 fh 2:1:800 order 2048 key ht 2 bkt
> 1 flowid 1:201
> match 50611801/ffffffff at 12
> filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 5 u32 fh 800: ht divisor 1
> filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 5 u32 fh 800::800 order 2048 key ht 800
> bkt 0 link 2:
> match 50611800/ffffff00 at 12
> hash mask 000000ff at 12
>
>
>
> Configuration 1
> tc filter show dev eth1
> shows the next lines:
>
> filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 1 u32
> filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 2: ht divisor 256
> filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 2:1:800 order 2048 key ht 2 bkt
> 1 flowid 1:201
> match 50611801/ffffffff at 12
> filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 800: ht divisor 1
> filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 800::800 order 2048 key ht 800
> bkt 0 link 2:
> match 50611800/ffffff00 at 12
> hash mask 000000ff at 12
>
> Why the configutaion1 has many filters than configuration2?
> How can the prio paramenter influence this?
> What is the range for the prio parameter in the filter context?
> Thank you.
>
> Victor
>
>
> -----------------------------------------
> This email was sent using SquirrelMail.
> "Webmail for nuts!"
> http://squirrelmail.org/
>
>
> Random Thought:
> --------------
> Integrity has no need for rules.
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>
---
Catalin(ux) BOIE
catab@deuroconsult.ro
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-09 5:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-08 22:46 [LARTC] filter Victor
2003-10-09 5:08 ` Catalin BOIE [this message]
2003-10-09 16:40 ` Stef Coene
2003-10-10 5:09 ` Catalin BOIE
2003-10-10 19:49 ` Stef Coene
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-106567619621486@msgid-missing \
--to=util@deuroconsult.ro \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.