From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anton Yurchenko Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 08:44:16 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2? Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com wrote: >Hello Anton, > >Wednesday, October 8, 2003, 4:49:30 PM, you wrote: > >I am using HTB3 with more than 10 megabits customers, and >amount of classes about 100-200 without any problem. >Only one what i do - i make filter with lowest priority, to not pass >ass unclassified traffic to default class, just to drop it. I think >you just need review your classes, because also if you have any rate >more 468 Kbit, you need change r2q or quantum. > > the problem was observed even when only adding a qdisc, no classes. how can this be? >AY> Hello, > >AY> I`ve been using htb v2 for more then a year without any major problems. >AY> Recently I needed to upgrade to newer kernel becouse of non LARTC >AY> related issues. After installing 2.4.22 when the htb qdisc was attached >AY> to the interface even without any rules, I was not able to send more >AY> ~1mbit through the interface. After I reversed the htb3 patch and >AY> rebuild with htb2 everything works as normal. Has anyone experienced the >AY> same issue? thanks > > > > > > -- Anton Yurchenko Digital Generation _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/