From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stef Coene Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 16:45:22 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2? Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 09 October 2003 10:44, Anton Yurchenko wrote: > nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com wrote: > >Hello Anton, > > > >Wednesday, October 8, 2003, 4:49:30 PM, you wrote: > > > >I am using HTB3 with more than 10 megabits customers, and > >amount of classes about 100-200 without any problem. > >Only one what i do - i make filter with lowest priority, to not pass > >ass unclassified traffic to default class, just to drop it. I think > >you just need review your classes, because also if you have any rate > >more 468 Kbit, you need change r2q or quantum. > > the problem was observed even when only adding a qdisc, no classes. how > can this be? What's the output of tc -s -d qdisc show dev eth0 tc -s -d class show dev eth0 Stef -- stef.coene@docum.org "Using Linux as bandwidth manager" http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.openprojects.net _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/