From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Brandis Jaroslav" <jaroslav.brandis@softec.sk>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:21:17 +0000
Subject: RE: [LARTC] Linux bandwidth arbitrator
Message-Id: <marc-lartc-106639205404270@msgid-missing>
List-Id: <lartc.vger.kernel.org>
References: <marc-lartc-106604461315058@msgid-missing>
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-106604461315058@msgid-missing>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org

> 
> Its bizzare how the "linux bandwidth arbitrator" authors have 
> never heard of HTB, LARTC people have not heard of "arbitrator". :)
> 
> arbitrator has some nice features, it acctually tracks the 
> bandwidth usage and can limit the big spenders - so its more 
> dynamic than pure "tc". 

But it's very useful function isn't it ? 

> The problem is its completelly different than "tc" and 
> requires a number of strange kernel patches (that perhaps are 
> not tested enough). 
> 
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/