From: Payal Rathod <payal-lartc@staticky.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] default route
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 07:25:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-106749880214790@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-106749406611702@msgid-missing>
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 04:29:25PM +1000, Damion de Soto wrote:
> >Is it possible to use more than one default route? I believe yes.
> >Any comments on them. If I use more than one, where will the trafficc be
> >diverted from?
> That's a good question. I was going to answer your other post, but did
> some tests
> which contradicted what I was going to say.
>
> I originally thought if you had two default routes on the same metric,
> traffic would just go out the first one, however, when I tried this
> earlier, I started losing packets, so I can only assume the packets were
> going out the other route, and then getting lost. anyone comment on this ?
A friend of mine says that if y ou have 2 default routes on different
subnets each the routing will be done randomly. Unfortunately I do not
have that kind of setup to test.
I did it on same subnet using 2 default routes and found that I was
losing packets too.
> If you use the ip route tool to created multiple weighted or equalized
> default routes, you then use source-based routing to make sure that the
> traffic goes back out the same route it came in on.
> (unless you're trying to be tricky with asymetrical routing)
Isn't random routing (without depending on source) easy to implement
than source based routing?
Can you please tell what you mean by using ip route to create multiple
weighted routes? I have absoluttely no idea what ip command does
exactly. I am using just plain "route" and ifconfig. Are they
decrepated?
With warm regards,
-Payal
--
For GNU/Linux Success Stories and Articles visit:
http://payal.staticky.com
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-30 7:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-30 5:56 [LARTC] default route Payal Rathod
2003-10-30 6:29 ` Damion de Soto
2003-10-30 7:25 ` Payal Rathod [this message]
2003-10-30 7:49 ` Vadiraj C S
2003-10-30 7:54 ` Vadiraj C S
2003-10-30 8:08 ` Vadiraj C S
2003-10-30 8:40 ` Payal Rathod
2003-10-31 0:43 ` N N Ashok
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-106749880214790@msgid-missing \
--to=payal-lartc@staticky.com \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.