From: "Artūras Šlajus" <x11@h2o.pieva.net>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [LARTC] Fair queueing: SFQ vs TBF
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 09:04:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-106983872325105@msgid-missing> (raw)
Hello,
I have one Q. What is better when using as leaf in one leaf with
several hosts (like subnet) to splice traffic equaly to user number?
Like 2 users = 256/2, 3 = 256/3 and so on. WRR was pretty good for this
job, but it's only for 2.4.21 kernels and mine's 2.4.22.
So what is better: SFQ or TBF?
--
Artūras Šlajus
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next reply other threads:[~2003-11-26 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-26 9:04 Artūras Šlajus [this message]
2003-11-26 11:24 ` [LARTC] Fair queueing: SFQ vs TBF Laradji nacer
2003-12-17 0:59 ` jzeeff
2003-12-17 2:17 ` Steen Suder, privat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-106983872325105@msgid-missing \
--to=x11@h2o.pieva.net \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.