From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michal Charvat <michal@lounsko.cz>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:19:57 +0000
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Graphing tc output
Message-Id: <marc-lartc-107115606302426@msgid-missing>
List-Id: <lartc.vger.kernel.org>
References: <marc-lartc-107107433516257@msgid-missing>
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-107107433516257@msgid-missing>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org

> Mhh.  It should be handy if there is a way to determine the parent-child
> relation ship.....

You are right, handles in this case are a bit confusing (major:minor
together isn't the best way...). You can determine parent-child
relationship from these numbers (as said in archive, higher 16bits are
major number, lower minor).

It would be possible to provide major/minor separately in table and leave
indexing in major:minor scheme as is now.
What do you think about this possibility?

Michal
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/