From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Steen Suder, privat" Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 13:03:19 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] Problems with ICQ etc. on nano-setup Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org c0g wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > | Can one "bind" traffic from one LAN-user to the same DSL, effective in > | lets say 10 minutes from the initial connection? > | Can some magic with conntrack be put to use? > > You should do Equal Cost Multipath (iproute) + MARK target instead of > state-based loadbalancing for problematic protocols/sites. > > Create table with default route thru multiple gateways with equalize > option. Then direct problematic traffic to this table (using routing > rules and mark matching) Could I not just apply this method to all traffic? > Equal Cost Multipath chooses route based on source and destination IP, > so it bounds client to route, no matter how many connections that client > made. Sounds better, actually. Can you point in the direction of some practical examples? Perhaps some specific documentation? > It works for me. > > PS: I assume you have separate network interface in your Linux router > for each DSL, so you can do SNAT on each interface. If you have them > connected to one NIC then it not that simple, but may be resolved with > route realms (but not sure for 100%). This assumption is correct. The box has a separate, physical interface for each DSL and I do simple SNAT for each outgoing (DSL) interface as it is now. -- Mvh. / Best regards, Steen Suder ICQ UIN 4133803 _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/