From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Bergqvist daniel@netatonce.se
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 16:11:34 +0000
Subject: SV: [LARTC] Conceptual (but fast :) question
Message-Id: <marc-lartc-98373938216962@msgid-missing>
List-Id: <lartc.vger.kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org

<PRE>The leaf classes need a queue for the packets and since the classes do=
esn't
have their own queue they use the queue in the qdisc. You may use CBQ as
leaf qdisc too.

Regards,
Daniel

-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Fr=E5n: <A HREF=3D"mailto:lartc-admin@mailman.ds9a.nl">lartc-admin@mailman.=
ds9a.nl</A> [mailto:<A HREF=3D"mailto:lartc-admin@mailman.ds9a.nl">lartc-ad=
min@mailman.ds9a.nl</A>]F=F6r
Juanjo Ciarlante
Skickat: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 4:31 PM
Till: <A HREF=3D"mailto:lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl">lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl</A>
=C4mne: [LARTC] Conceptual (but fast :) question

Why do CBQ setups need leaf qdiscs (tbf, sfq, etc) to achieve CBQ rate?
 (and all the (aparently) redundant rate setup ...? )

TIA
Juanjo

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / <A HREF=3D"mailto:LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl">LARTC@mailman=
.ds9a.nl</A>
<A HREF=3D"http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc">http://mailman.ds=
9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc</A> HOWTO:
<A HREF=3D"http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/">http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/</A>



</PRE>