All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junus Junarto junus@mail.com
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [LARTC] traffic shaping
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2001 13:56:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-98373940416825@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-98373940416818@msgid-missing>

<PRE>To make dynamic balance traffic shaping, maybe we can use WRR quequing.
You can look at: Linux 2.4 Advanced Routing Howto; section 9.6
Or you can go directly to <A HREF="http://wipl-wrr.dkik.dk/wrr">http://wipl-wrr.dkik.dk/wrr</A>

Regards,
Junus Junarto D

Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2001 04:52:54 +0100
&gt;<i> To: &quot;Wouter Smit&quot; &lt;<A HREF="mailto:wouter@smit.dhs.org">wouter@smit.dhs.org</A>&gt;
</I>&gt;<i> From: Sander &lt;<A HREF="mailto:thrill12@gmx.net">thrill12@gmx.net</A>&gt;
</I>&gt;<i> Subject: Re: [LARTC] traffic shaping
</I>&gt;<i> So we now have 1 root class of 128 kbit, two subclasses of 64 kbit, each
</I>of
&gt;<i> those subclass serving 3 people.
</I>&gt;<i> The 40kbit per person thing was done with one purpose: when 1 person
</I>starts
&gt;<i> the upload, and another person kicks in, the first person still gets
</I>&gt;<i> 128Kbit - 40Kbit and the second one gets that 40 Kbit. This is more then
</I>&gt;<i> one would get when we would simply divide 128Kbit by 6. I don't yet know
</I>&gt;<i> how to get the loadbalancing system to divide the space evenly (1
</I>&gt;<i> person\x128 Kbit, 2 persons = 64Kbit, 3CKbit etc..), but haven't come up
</I>&gt;<i> with a solution yet.
</I>

______________________________________________
FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
Sign up at <A HREF="http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup">http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup</A>


</PRE>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-01-05 13:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-01-04 12:22 [LARTC] traffic shaping Wouter
2001-01-04 18:17 ` Sander
2001-01-05  3:52 ` Sander
2001-01-05 11:42 ` Wouter
2001-01-05 13:56 ` Junus [this message]
2001-01-05 13:56 ` Junus
2001-01-06  9:25 ` [LARTC] Traffic shaping Bruno
2001-01-07 13:54 ` Junus
2001-12-25 12:15 ` [LARTC] Traffic Shaping Sahil Gupta - NET4U
2001-12-25 12:27 ` bert hubert
2001-12-25 12:33 ` Sahil Gupta - NET4U
2001-12-25 12:34 ` Sahil Gupta - NET4U
2001-12-25 12:42 ` bert hubert
2002-01-22  4:52 ` [LARTC] traffic shaping Antonis Lazaridis
2002-01-22  7:44 ` Martin Devera
2002-01-23  8:23 ` Martin Devera
2002-01-23  9:42 ` Antonis Lazaridis
2002-01-23  9:51 ` Martin Devera
2002-01-25  8:11 ` Antonis Lazaridis
2002-01-26 23:00 ` Martin Devera
2002-01-27  1:21 ` Re[2]: " Will Lotto
2002-01-27  8:47 ` Stef Coene
2002-02-08  5:17 ` Antonis Lazaridis
2002-02-08 17:22 ` Riaz Mahmood
2006-10-04 20:45 ` Roberto Scattini
2007-05-06 20:14 ` [LARTC] Traffic Shaping Rangi Biddle
2007-05-07  8:25 ` AW: " Simo
2007-05-07 18:06 ` Rangi Biddle
2007-05-08  3:16 ` Rangi Biddle
2007-10-24 18:37 ` [LARTC] Traffic shaping Mohammad Shakir

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-lartc-98373940416825@msgid-missing \
    --to=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.