From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bert hubert ahu@ds9a.nl Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2001 15:26:39 +0000 Subject: [LARTC] traffic shaping with 2 class c's Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org 
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 09:08:10AM -0600, Chris Glanzer wrote:
> Hello, I really appreciate this site.  Finally, there is updated info on cbq
> and people with knowledge to back it up - - Thanks
> 
> Here is my situation,
> I am at a college with a single 512k line for 450 machines.  Our servers and
> fac/staff are on C class x.x.166.x and all students are on C class x.x.167.x
> .  Currently, a few student machines are monopolizing our connection for
> napster and make business related telnet painfully slow (all telnet is
> pointed at the same server off campus.)

> 1.) I wanted to make sure that it was possible to have 2 C class addresses
> behind IProute2.

Of course.

> 2.) Would it be possible to limit napster on a per-session basis and also
> have a combined limit?

Not sure. I think napster *traffic* looks like http. Also, I'm not sure if
you can limit per tcp session.

> 3.) Currently, we are not supporting DCHP and I do not have the resources to
> change the gateways on all machines.  Would that be needed?  The current
> router/gateway is x.x.166.254, it would be possible for me to add an
> additional IP address to it.  This is probably my biggest concern, since I
> want to maintain all my current, real IP's.

If your router is already Linux, I don't see any problem.

Regards,

bert hubert

-- 
PowerDNS                     Versatile DNS Services  
Trilab                       The Technology People   
'SYN! .. SYN|ACK! .. ACK!' - the mating call of the internet