From: Borut Mrak borut.mrak@ijs.si
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [LARTC] who is the "right" parent in tc filter statements?
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 12:38:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-98373940417026@msgid-missing> (raw)
<PRE>Hello!
My setup is quite simple:
I have a Linux router which does traffic shaping. All is well while
each customer has separate bandwidth:
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 10: cbq bandwidth 100Mbit avpkt 1000
tc class add dev eth0 parent 10:0 classid 10:1 cbq bandwidth 100Mbit rate \
256kbit allot 1514 weight 100kbit prio 5 maxburst 1 avpkt 1000 bounded
tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 10:1 sfq quantum 1514b perturb 15
tc filter add dev eth0 parent 10:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip src \
xxx.xx.xxx.xx flowid 10:1
Now I have two customers with a setup like this:
each has 256k bandwidth, but they should be able to share it between
them if the other one doesn't use it (therefore I've left out the "bounded"
part):
tc class add dev eth0 parent 10:0 classid 10:200 cbq bandwidth 100Mbit rate \
512kbit allot 1514 weight 100kbit prio 5 maxburst 1 avpkt 1000 bounded
tc class add dev eth0 parent 10:200 classid 10:201 cbq bandwidth 100Mbit rate \
256kbit allot 1514 weight 100kbit prio 5 maxburst 1 avpkt 1000
tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 10:201 sfq quantum 1514b perturb 15
tc filter add dev eth0 parent 10:200 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip src \
xxx.xxx.xx.29 flowid 10:201
tc class add dev eth0 parent 10:200 classid 10:202 cbq bandwidth 100Mbit rate \
256kbit allot 1514 weight 100kbit prio 5 maxburst 1 avpkt 1000
tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 10:202 sfq quantum 1514b perturb 15
tc filter add dev eth0 parent 10:200 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip src \
xxx.xxx.xx.28 flowid 10:202
Now, did I do the right thing setting parent to 10:200 (the joint 512k class)
in tc filter statements? If this is correct, it could be added to the howto.
That part is missing in chapter 9.4 - Class subdivision.
thanks,
--
Borut
<A HREF="mailto:borut.mrak@ijs.si">borut.mrak@ijs.si</A>
-----------------
There *is* something on port 23 but it ain't TELNET...
Zack Weinberg in Scary Devil Monastery.
</PRE>
reply other threads:[~2001-02-16 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-98373940417026@msgid-missing \
--to=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.