From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gregory Maxwell Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 11:29:45 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] PRIO, TBF, RED, WRR, CSZ, .... Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 05:48:01PM +0800, Rick Goh wrote: > Hi all, > I would like to show CBQ works better at controlling bandwidth than PRIO, TBF, RED, WRR, CSZ, etc. Why? Each serves it's purpose. CBQ isn't that good for delay and jitter while CSZ is. > Is it possible to stream 3 flows of controlled bandwidth at say 5, 30, 65 Mbps from 1 server to 3 computers and then see how well each queueing discipline works?? Sure. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/