All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krepper Guillermo <billy@ciudadglobal.com.ar>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [LARTC] With queueing discipline ???
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 13:08:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-98500769810420@msgid-missing> (raw)

Hello 
	I'm looking for some advise, based on experience ..... an actuallly using 
SFQ and TBF queueing disciplines. First I would like to say what I want to.

OK I have 256Kbit BW I wish make 2 groups of 128Kbit, and again split each 
one in 2 of 64Kbit. So far so good, now I wish to put in each group of 64Kbit 
5 clients, hoping a load balancing betwin them.

256 Kbit
-- 128 Kbit
---- 64 Kbit
              192.168.1.1
              192.168.1.2
              192.168.1.3
              192.168.1.4
              192.168.1.5

---- 64 Kbit
              192.168.1.6
              192.168.1.7
              192.168.1.8
              192.168.1.9
              192.168.1.10


My experiences are this:

ACLARATION: All of  this is what I see in my results, not what the teory says

TBF: When balancin. new connection starts from 0Kbit to 64Kbit /(max 
clients), but have some problems to get to this or it tack to much time to 
balance so for web traffic it has some trouble. 
SFQ:  new connection starts from 64Kbit to 64Kbit /(max clients), this one 
works verry good. But still has some prblems on web traffic. I don't know why 
peak of 64Kbit in the start point dies and goes to 0Kbit and then starts to 
go up.
Well I don't know if someone could understand what i'm trying to say ... but 
if you can. Could this be posible?


And or my final and last with queueing discipline could fet best to my needs.


thanks Billy



_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/

                 reply	other threads:[~2001-03-19 13:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-lartc-98500769810420@msgid-missing \
    --to=billy@ciudadglobal.com.ar \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.