From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Russell Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 04:43:20 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] Load balancing on multiple NICs with iproute Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org Umm, no they're not :) These statements are inserted as straight default routes into the main routing table. What would a command for multipath route look like? If it is what I think it is last time I tried to add one I received an error in the process. If I add a multipath route I assume i should add it to the main table and that I should remove the three default routes shown in your last email? -- Scott On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 01:40:52PM +0100, Arthur van Leeuwen wrote: > On Sun, 18 Mar 2001, Scott Russell wrote: > > > default via 9.37.144.1 dev tr2 > > default via 9.37.144.1 dev tr1 > > default via 9.37.144.1 dev tr0 > > Interesting. This doesn't seem to be a multipath route. Did you add the > multipath route with the nexthop commands? > > Doei, Arthur. > > -- > /\ / | arthurvl@sci.kun.nl | Work like you don't need the money > /__\ / | A friend is someone with whom | Love like you have never been hurt > / \/__ | you can dare to be yourself | Dance like there's nobody watching -- Regards, Scott Russell (scottrus@raleigh.ibm.com) Linux Technology Center, System Admin, RHCE. T/L 441-9289 / External 919-543-9289 http://bzimage.raleigh.ibm.com/webcam _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/