From: "Juergen" <lchou@staff.pccu.edu.tw>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Modelling a slow [56K connection] to specific computers on a LAN
Date: Fri, 04 May 2001 03:37:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-98895354329206@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-98894677019395@msgid-missing>
> Hi, I am currently using Linux 2.2.19 and am attached to many other
> boxes on a switched 100 Mbit Lan. For some experiments, I would like to
> model a 56K dial-up connection to a webserver on one machine [maybe
> more] on the LAN. Techniques regarding modelling the speed in the
> inbound direction only would be appreciated
>
> I have read [more like skimmed through the Linux 2.4 Advanced Routing
> HowTO but am not sure if that is applicable to 2.2 and
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I have tried and it's successful.
But you have to make your kernel to support CBQ
like below
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
NETWORK OPTION
open IP: use TOS valus as routing key
open IP: use FWMARK valus as routing key
open IP: advanced router
open IP: policy routing
NETWORK OPTION --> QoS and/or fair queueing(last option)
<M>CBQ
<M>CSZ
<M>The simplest PRIO pseudoscheduler
<M>RED
<M>SFQ
<M>TEQL
<M>TBF
<*>QoS support
<*>Rate estimator
<*>Packet classifier API
<M>Routing table based classifier
<M>Firewall
<M>U32
<M>Special RSVP classifier
<M>Special RSVP classifier FOR IPv6
<*>Ingres traffic policing
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
And then you can use iproute to add CBQ to your network interface.
> scenario's where the machine is not a router but a host]. I am more
> familiar with FreeBSD ipfw and dummynet but don't want to setup a
> separate traffic shaper box in bridging mode for this
>
> my question is, Is this possible in Linux 2.2. I don't compile my
> kernel's with firewall support. Is this a requirement
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
no...it's not the same thing.
CBQ is for the bandwidth management....and firewall support is for the nat
function...
I know that you can use altq to support FreeBSD for bandwidth management.
http://www.csl.sony.co.jp/person/kjc/programs.html#ALTQ
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-04 3:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-04 3:31 [LARTC] Modelling a slow [56K connection] to specific computers on a LAN Yusuf Goolamabbas
2001-05-04 3:37 ` Juergen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-98895354329206@msgid-missing \
--to=lchou@staff.pccu.edu.tw \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.