All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kurt Wagner <kwagner@cosy.sbg.ac.at>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Is this a mistake (AF level)?????
Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 15:47:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-98942308530265@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-98938247512870@msgid-missing>

Hello Juergen,

> I saw the draft-almesberger-wajhak-diffserv-linux-00.txt file.
> But in this file say that AF21 is 0x18

and two paragraphs before that they state that AF21 is 0x12 - so maybe its
a typing error. Or the AF-DSCP values were not defined clearly at that
time - both, rfc2597 and the draft were written in june99. Or its pure
stubbornness - imagine Werner realy _wanted_ his AF22 to be 0x1a. The
values in rfc2597 are RECOMMENDED values after all. ;)

> If the rfc2597 is right(list below)
>   The RECOMMENDED values of the AF codepoints are as follows: AF11 = '
>    001010', AF12 = '001100', AF13 = '001110', AF21 = '010010', AF22 = '
>    010100', AF23 = '010110', AF31 = '011010', AF32 = '011100', AF33 = '
>    011110', AF41 = '100010', AF42 = '100100', and AF43 = '100110'.
>
> AF21 and AF22 is 010010 and 010100
> 010010 = 0x12
> 010100 = 0x14
> is that right??????

Yes.

> Why many papers and documents arent' use this table?????

Stubbornness, ignorance, inertia, eccentricsm, typos... hmm, probably
mostly ignorance - that's my guess.


Kurt




_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/

      reply	other threads:[~2001-05-09 15:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-05-09  4:25 [LARTC] Is this a mistake (AF level)????? Juergen
2001-05-09 15:47 ` Kurt Wagner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-lartc-98942308530265@msgid-missing \
    --to=kwagner@cosy.sbg.ac.at \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.