All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Deepak singhal" <dsinghal@spacewayindia.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Routing
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2001 06:33:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-99448624006390@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-98373940416816@msgid-missing>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3332 bytes --]

I think there is a simple solution to all this. This is what we do in DVB recieve-only service. What u have to do is to masquerade all ur outgoing traffic to some ip address of ur 1.5 mb link and route it through 384kbps link. As the ip address which is sent out is of that of 1.5 mb link ..it will return back through ur 1.5 mb link automatically .

Only restriction is that u shld hv real ips for both links , what i mean by that is ..ur outgoing traffic shld not get masquerade agn ..as then the traffic will come back thgh the same link. 

Deepak Singhal
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Dave Miller 
  To: LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl 
  Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 8:48 PM
  Subject: Re: [LARTC] Routing


  Actually, both lines must use PPPOE - non static ip's (thanks Verizon and Bellatlantic), I had the Bellatlantic account before the merger, and now have the second through Verizon.  Doing a double pppoe is no big deal thanks to Roaring Penguin's software using the GUI that is available.  If my understanding is correct - if I could change the source address of all the packets going out through the 384 line to read what the pppoe address is for the 1.5mb line - should that not work?  The rest of the world would see the source address as that of  the 1.5 line instead of the 384 line. I just don't know how to do that.

  Dave

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: "Arthur van Leeuwen" <arthurvl@sci.kun.nl>
  To: "Dave Miller" <lartc@millerscomp.com>
  Cc: <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
  Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 11:01 AM
  Subject: Re: [LARTC] Routing


  > On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, Dave Miller wrote:
  > 
  > > I am running RH 7.0 (kernel 2.2.16) as a router/masq machine with 5 windows
  > > machines connected internally.  I have 2 dsl lines as internet
  > > connections, - the first is 384k up and down.  The second is 1.5mbit down
  > > and only 90kb up.  Is there a way to send all my upload / requests out
  > > the 384 line, but have it return on the download side of the 1.5mb line?
  > 
  > If both lines serve the same network, yes. However, as the dsl lines are
  > most probably not to IP addresses in the same network, it is quite unlikely
  > that you will succeed. The problem is not whether or not you can configure
  > your system to do so; the problem is getting the rest of the world to
  > recognize that your return packets should be routed back to provider 2
  > even though your packets came from provider 1.
  > 
  > > That would give me the best of both worlds currently.
  > > Since I'm using masq., does that complicate things?
  > > Would I be better off using Kernel 2.4 with it's advanced features?
  > 
  > For routing that is a non-issue. All advanced routing stuff was in 2.2.17
  > already, but the traffic control stuff didn't mature until 2.4.
  > 
  > Doei, Arthur.
  > 
  > -- 
  >   /\    / |      arthurvl@sci.kun.nl      | Work like you don't need the money
  >  /__\  /  | A friend is someone with whom | Love like you have never been hurt
  > /    \/__ | you can dare to be yourself   | Dance like there's nobody watching
  > 
  > 
  > _______________________________________________
  > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
  > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5362 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-07-07  6:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-01-03 11:13 [LARTC] routing Spyros
2001-01-03 12:37 ` David
2001-01-05 12:25 ` Junus
2001-01-05 12:33 ` Junus
2001-07-06 14:03 ` [LARTC] Routing Dave Miller
2001-07-06 15:01 ` Arthur van Leeuwen
2001-07-06 15:18 ` Dave Miller
2001-07-07  6:33 ` Deepak singhal [this message]
2001-07-07 18:24 ` Arthur van Leeuwen
2001-07-07 18:33 ` Dave Miller
2001-07-07 18:37 ` Arthur van Leeuwen
2001-12-25  4:58 ` [LARTC] routing Daniel Wittenberg
2001-12-25 12:16 ` bert hubert
2002-10-30 12:57 ` [LARTC] Routing Jose Sebastiao Martins
2002-10-30 15:57 ` Martin A. Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-lartc-99448624006390@msgid-missing \
    --to=dsinghal@spacewayindia.com \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.