From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 00:46:56 +0000
Subject: [LARTC] 2.2 vs 2.4 for TC
Message-Id: <marc-lartc-99489891015157@msgid-missing>
List-Id: <lartc.vger.kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org

Hi,

A while ago I saw a message saying that the TC features in 2.2 aren't
very mature, and I'm wondering what I'd be missing out on if I stayed
with 2.2 instead of using 2.4 now.

I'm quite familiar with ipchians, and advanced routing on 2.2.  I
don't plan on doing any layer 2 based rules, so that's not an issue.

TIA,

Mike

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/