From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nikolai Vladychevski <niko@isl.net.mx>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 18:51:15 +0000
Subject: Re: [LARTC] 2.2 vs 2.4 for TC
Message-Id: <marc-lartc-99496382611309@msgid-missing>
List-Id: <lartc.vger.kernel.org>
References: <marc-lartc-99489891015157@msgid-missing>
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-99489891015157@msgid-missing>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org

Mike Fedyk wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> A while ago I saw a message saying that the TC features in 2.2 aren't
> very mature, and I'm wondering what I'd be missing out on if I stayed
> with 2.2 instead of using 2.4 now.

download 2.4.6
download 2.2.lastest

make a diff on net/sched directory and see the difference. You would
miss like  2000 lines of bugfixes if you stay with 2.2, but anyway 2.4.6
is not yet stable with "tc features", so if it works for you dont move
it until 2.4.15 or so ... 


Nikolai

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/